MENU

HOME

DAILY BRIEF

JIHAD JOE

SOURCEBOOKS

J.M. BERGER

RECENT WORK

MULTIFACETED MEDIA GROUP

LINKS

Blogs of War

Flashpoint

Gunpowder & Lead

Internet Haganah

Jihadology

Jihadica

Long War Journal

Making Sense of Jihad

Registan

Selected Wisdom

Views from the Occident

Waq-Al-Waq

TAGS

American Terrorists

Anwar Awlaki

Al Qaeda

AQAP

American Al Qaeda Members

Inspire Magazine

Revolution Muslim

OKBOMB


News, analysis and primary source documents on terrorism, extremism and national security.


Monday, April 22, 2013
 

Marathon Bombing: Issues to Watch

By J.M. Berger

The Boston Marathon bombing will have consequences in the weeks, months and years to come. I plan to write about some of these points at more length, as time allows, but I wanted to briefly outline a couple of the most significant issues raised by the attack so we can start thinking and talking about them.

  • Budgets: Most people working in counterterrorism studies have seen training and research money dry up pretty significantly over the last two years in the United States, especially relation to Islamist and Al Qaeda-inspired terrorism. The Boston bombing may or may not herald a change in the tempo, effectiveness or essential nature of the homeland terrorist threat, but will it change the budget dynamics? Should it?

  • Focus: Not unrelated to the first point, many people who study terrorism and extremism have, over the last two years, refocused on the prospect of domestic right-wing terrorism as the "next big thing." This was reflected in the widespread speculation about right-wing attribution of the attack in the early hours and well into the week. We were only beginning to see a commitment to the study of non-Muslim domestic extremism from academia, credible NGOs and the private sector. Will those studies -- which I think are important -- be sidetracked by the attribution of this attack? If they continue, will they continue to be confined only to "right wing" extremism? Or will all of this remain a cobwebbed corner of the research world until something terrible happens, and everyone asks why nobody saw it coming?

  • Attribution and the definition of terrorism: The question of attributing the Marathon bombing ran hot last week, with a lot of rampant speculation in the media based on little or no information, blaming a number of possible motivations and even speculating the bombing was not political. With a suspect captured alive and additional information flowing in rapidly, it looks like we'll get some answers to these questions in the weeks ahead, but we still haven't figured out how to handle cases where attribution is weak or absent -- for example, the 2012 Sikh temple shooting in which an avowed white supremacist carried out a mass shooting against non-whites, but without leaving a statement of his purpose or any particular clues as to his motivation (aside from being a white supremacist). Given the events of the last 18 months, it's increasingly clear we need to define what is terrorism and why, so that we can craft consistent policy responses.

  • The definition of Al Qaeda: Sorry to be a broken record on this, but we still haven't fixed the problem I've been talking about for years now -- what is Al Qaeda, what isn't, and how do those definitions affect policy and counterterrorism strategy? News coverage and speculation about the attacks this week highlighted this continuing problem, and it was further emphasized as the media rushed to try to figure out exactly what a Chechen jihadist is and whether it has to do with Al Qaeda. We need a clear consensus definition of Al Qaeda, so that we can craft consistent strategies and policies. Until then, we will continue to flail around every time a counterterrorism issue arises.

  • The mainstreaming of conspiracy culture: We entered a brave new world last week when a reporter from the conspiracy Web site Infowars trolled CNN's live coverage with a bullhorn and crashed not one but two press conferences related to the bombing with questions about whether the attack was a "false flag" (meaning it was staged by the government to justify draconian security measures). Infowars and sites like it are increasingly driving chatter and defining world views among domestic extremists on both the right and the left, but there's very little study of this issue and very little understanding of how conspiracy theories, whether specific or generalized, do or do not relate to extremism and the prospect of violence. It's time to start shining a light on this issue. 

For more information about J.M. Berger, visit www.jmberger.com or buy his book, Jihad Joe: Americans Who Go to War in the Name of Islam. Contact information is available at the top of this page. 

RECENT PUBLICATIONS


Views expressed on INTELWIRE are those of the author alone.


     



     

Tweets referencing this post:

loading..



ISIS: THE STATE
OF TERROR

ISIS: The State of Terror, by Jessica Stern and J.M. BergerJessica Stern and J.M. Berger co-author the forthcoming book, "ISIS: The State of Terror," from Ecco, an imprint of HarperCollins. The book, which will debut in early 2015, will examine the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, its potential fall, how it is transforming the nature of extremist movements, and how we should evaluate the threat it presents. Jessica Stern is a Harvard lecturer on terrorism and the author of the seminal text Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill. J.M. Berger is author of the definitive book on American jihadists, Jihad Joe: Americans Who Go to War in the Name of Islam, a frequent contributor to Foreign Policy, and editor of Intelwire.com.

Pre-order the book now | Pre-order Kindle version

JIHAD JOE

Jihad Joe by J.M. BergerJihad Joe: Americans Who Go To War In The Name Of Islam, the new book by INTELWIRE's J.M. Berger, is now available in both Kindle and hardcover editions. Order today!

Jihad Joe is the first comprehensive history of the American jihadist movement, from 1979 through the present. Click here to read more about the critical acclaim Jihad Joe has earned so far, including from the New York Times, Publisher's Weekly, Redstate.com and many more.

RECENT

Newest posts!

Background on Marathon Bombers Tamerlan Tsarnaev a...

A day in the life of a terrorism analyst, 2013 edi...

On Comparing White Nationalists to Anarchists

Best-Liked on the Most-Wanted

A Closer Look at the SPLC's Hate List

Inspire 10: Still sucks

Bum Rap

Should we disrupt terrorists on the Internet?

Former friend rips U.S. jihadi Hammami in online p...

Omar Hammami and the Trolls of Jihad

EXCLUSIVES


New York Pipe Bomb Suspect Linked to Revolution Muslim

The Utility of Lone Wolves

Interview with Online Jihadist Abu Suleiman Al Nasser

A Way Forward for CVE: The Five Ds

How Terrorists Use The Internet: Just Like You

PATCON: The FBI's Secret War on the Militia Movement

Interview About Jihad With Controversial Cleric Bilal Philips

Forgeries on the Jihadist Forums

U.S. Gave Millions To Charity Linked To Al Qaeda, Anwar Awlaki

State Department Secretly Met With Followers of Blind Sheikh

State Department Put 'Political Pressure' On FBI To Deport Brother-in-Law Of Osama Bin Laden In 1995

FBI Records Reveal Details Of Nixon-Era Racial Profiling Program Targeting Arabs

Gaza Flotilla Official Was Foreign Fighter in Bosnia War

U.S. Had 'High Confidence' Of UBL Attack In June 2001

Behind the Handshake: The Rumsfeld-Saddam Meeting